秀色直播

Ask the FERPA Professor

September 23, 2014
  • 秀色直播 Connect
  • FERPA

Dear FERPA Professor,

I work in the records department at a fully online institution. Thus, our communication with students is largely via e-mail and phone (from a staff perspective such as financial aid counselors, advising, registrars, etc.). I am trying to move the institution away from using the last 4 digits of the students鈥 social security numbers (SSN) as a way to verify caller identity. Rather, I am pushing the institution to adopt the use of a learner identification number and/or other pieces of data such as the course they are in and such.

However, I am getting some push back from a colleague who believes that our current practice is fine and permitted, and since we don鈥檛 use the whole SSN in our systems now as an identifier we are compliant. I contend that because we almost never see the student in front of us and do the vast majority of our interactions over the telephone or through e-mail, it is best not to use the social security numbers as a means of identification. Am I fighting for something that isn鈥檛 really a concern?

On this subject, as a matter of fact, we have also been wrestling with dual caller issues; where one of our students calls and has someone else on the line (friend, spouse, etc.) and gives verbal 鈥榦kay鈥 or recognition that this other individual is on the phone during the discussion of their personal educational record, history, academic plan, financial aid info, and so on. I鈥檝e advised that we need a written 3rd party release and should not be continuing such calls with people on the line other than the student. What can you tell me about this kind of situation? Is verbal release by the student on the phone enough?

Sincerely,

Outnumbered

________________

Dear Outnumbered,

You are correct to have concerns about any practice that permits the disclosure of student education records without meeting the authentication requirements of FERPA. This specific requirement was added in the 2009 regulations and can be found in 搂99.31(c). The preamble to these regulations explains that the use of commonly known identifiers such as SSN, student ID, date of birth, and so on, are not considered 鈥渞easonable鈥 under the regulations.

As for the dual caller issue, there is no such thing under FERPA as a 鈥渧erbal consent.鈥 There is signed consent, as required in 搂99.30 and there are exceptions to signed consent found in 搂99.31.

Sincerely,

The FERPA Professor

Subscribe

秀色直播's bi-weekly professional development e-newsletter is open to members and non-members alike.